Two findings from running /code-review on this branch.
The dispatch self-test's dirty arm asserted the run failed and named `f.rs`,
which is adjacent to the question -- a failure for any other reason naming that
file would have satisfied it. It now requires the cap's own message as well,
so the assertion names the question it means.
And .claude/skills/code-review/SKILL.md still told reviewers the flag "selects
rather than adds, so --check-evidence never runs the comment cap", which this
branch makes false. Grepped for every copy of the claim; that was the only one
outside context/. A doc that describes the script it gates is code, and leaving
it is the gotcha-48 failure exactly.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01FC2jVn8Au7E9JPkw6bwXXH
Edward Langley
0d847e9464