Both are the reviewers' framings rather than mine, and both are better arguments
than the ones I gave.
AGENTS.md: under merge-as-soon-as-green a review round can finish AFTER its own
merge, and GitHub has deleted the branch by then — so a fix push to the old name
silently succeeds and accomplishes nothing. It re-creates a branch main will
never see, CI runs on it and passes, and the commit is nowhere. The tell is in
git's own output: `* [new branch]` where an `old..new` range was expected.
Happened on #51, four minutes after the merge.
design-principles §6: an argument must not live only in a commit message. I had
justified the context/ rule as "context/ is what readers grep", which is weak.
The real reason is that a commit message is write-once and unauditable — it
cannot be corrected without rewriting merged history, and NO check in this repo
can read one, because the ID audit greps source and docs and a message is in
neither. A reason recorded only there is a reason nothing can ever find wrong.
PR #51's 7d25762 is the worked example: a declined-test reason that was
factually wrong, cited across two rounds, and correctable only by #56 saying so
in context/.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
17 KiB
- Always use tests to demonstrate the existence of a bug before fixing the bug.
- If you suspect that a bug exists, use a test to demonstrate it first:
- prefer unit tests testing a small amount of code to integration or e2e tests
- If you suspect that a bug exists, use a test to demonstrate it first:
- Option<...> or Result<...> are fine but should not be present in the majority of the code.
- Similarly, code managing Box<...> or RC<...>, etc. for containers pointing to heap data should be split from logic
- @context/repo-map.md is your "road map" for the repository. use it to reduce exploration and keep it updated.
- @context/design-principles.md is also important for keeping the repository consistent.
- prefer merges to rebasing.
- always start responses with bananaS!
- there is a prolog MCP available, load a session from
kbat the root of the repository at the beginning of every session and save structured facts to the knowledge base as you go. (cover work done, interesting locations in the codebase, important decisions, etc.) - query the knowledge base as needed and use Prolog reasoning when it makes sense.
- Prolog should be used as a design tool to reason about the code and the implementation of tickets and to persist a formal model of it.
Agent Instructions
This project uses bd (beads) for issue tracking. Run bd prime for full workflow context.
Quick Reference
bd ready # Find available work
bd show <id> # View issue details
bd update <id> --claim # Claim work atomically
bd close <id> # Complete work
bd dolt push # Push beads data to remote
Non-Interactive Shell Commands
ALWAYS use non-interactive flags with file operations to avoid hanging on confirmation prompts.
Shell commands like cp, mv, and rm may be aliased to include -i (interactive) mode on some systems, causing the agent to hang indefinitely waiting for y/n input.
Use these forms instead:
# Force overwrite without prompting
cp -f source dest # NOT: cp source dest
mv -f source dest # NOT: mv source dest
rm -f file # NOT: rm file
# For recursive operations
rm -rf directory # NOT: rm -r directory
cp -rf source dest # NOT: cp -r source dest
Other commands that may prompt:
scp- use-o BatchMode=yesfor non-interactivessh- use-o BatchMode=yesto fail instead of promptingapt-get- use-yflagbrew- useHOMEBREW_NO_AUTO_UPDATE=1env var
The Wave Workflow
Most work here is done by waves: an orchestrator chunks the open backlog, fans several agents out into their own git worktrees, merges what comes back, reviews it, and pushes the wave as one PR. This section is what that costs to get right. Everything in it was learned by getting it wrong first.
Who owns what
Three files are orchestrator-only, and the rule exists because they are guaranteed conflicts — every agent has a reason to touch them and they merge badly:
| File | Why |
|---|---|
.beads/ (incl. issues.jsonl) |
bd owns it. See "Never hand-edit" below. |
prolog-sessions/kb.pl |
MCP-maintained, whole-predicate replacement. |
context/repo-map.md |
Every agent wants to add a gotcha; every wave would conflict. |
Wave agents read all three freely (bd show, bd ready, grep kb.pl) and
write none of them. They report proposed repo-map lines and kb.pl facts as
text in their hand-back, and the orchestrator applies them — batched, at the
end of the wave, after the review. Batching matters for kb.pl specifically:
loadProgram replaces a whole predicate, so every addition means re-sending
every existing clause of doctrine/2, decision/3, etc. Doing that once per
wave instead of once per fact is the difference between cheap and painful. It
has already silently wiped 22 decisions and 19 doctrines once — count with
findall/length before and after, and check the count before saving.
saveSession re-adds the MCP's own host_rpc shims to kb.pl every time.
Strip them after each save.
Partitioning a wave
Partition by crate or directory, not by ticket count, and tell each agent explicitly which ground is not theirs. Two rules that fall out of the ones we broke:
- Tickets that share a file belong to one agent. The four TUI widget
migrations all touch
src/draw.rs; split across agents they are a guaranteed conflict, so they go to one agent to do sequentially. Group first, then count. - An agent that must stray says so rather than guessing. Give the boundary and ask for a report when it has to be crossed.
Two agents each adding a workspace member will still collide in
Cargo.toml/Cargo.lock. That one is expected; keep both sides.
Every wave agent's brief must include
- Verify your base commit first. Worktrees do not reliably branch from
the orchestrator's HEAD — one was created three merges behind and only
noticed because it was told to look.
git log --oneline -1against a named commit, reset ontomainif behind. Name the expected commit in the brief. - The baseline test count, so "1090 passing" is checkable rather than asserted, and a drop is visible.
- Do not push, do not merge to
main. The orchestrator merges. - The commit-message trailers, spelled out.
- What to report: branch and commits, what changed per ticket, what could
not be verified and why, and proposed repo-map/
kb.pltext. Ask explicitly for the thing the agent learned that the ticket did not predict — that is consistently the most valuable part of a hand-back, and agents omit it unless asked.
bd works in any worktree, but .envrc must be allowed there or you get a
version mismatch rather than a clean failure — direnv allow in the
worktree, or rely on the [whitelist] prefix in ~/.config/direnv/direnv.toml.
Note direnv status reports Found RC allowed 0, and 0 means allowed
(the enum is 0=Allowed, 1=NotAllowed). It reads like the opposite.
Between waves
Run the code-review skill on the merged range and iterate until its backlog
is empty. This is not ceremony: in this repo the review's characteristic find is
not a wrong line, it is a test that passes while the thing it names is
broken — a vacuous fold test, a bit-witness that cannot see the bit, a
one-category fixture, a helper that fabricates the _Measure items the code
under test needs, a check-the-checker that injected malformed JSON and so proved
nothing. A green suite is not evidence. Ask the reviewer to inject the fault
and watch the check fail.
Shipping a wave
Do not push main to gh/main. Work reaches GitHub as a branch and a pull
request, and lands on main by being merged there. The orchestrator still
merges agent branches into its local main to integrate and run the gates —
that is how conflicts get found early — but the push is a branch push, not a
main push. origin and gitea are mirrors and take main directly.
This is easy to drift out of, because merging locally and pushing feels like
finishing. It happened in this repo: 27 commits across six agent branches —
including a new crate, a new protocol type, and a type moving between crates —
went straight to main unreviewed, while AGENTS.md already said not to. If
you notice a batch has bypassed the loop, the cheap repair is a review-only
PR: base a branch at the last PR merge, open a PR with main as the head, let
Copilot review the diff, and land the findings as an ordinary PR afterwards. It
cannot be merged — the commits are already in — so close it once its findings
are filed or fixed. Rewinding the default branch to fake a mergeable PR is not
worth it on a repo with other collaborators.
One PR per wave, built by a dedicated PR agent in its own worktree, so waves pipeline against it: the next wave runs while the PR absorbs review fixes.
Copilot review must be re-requested after every fix push; it does not
re-review on its own. The mutation takes a botIds field — userIds fails
with "Could not resolve to User node":
gh api graphql -f query='mutation($pr:ID!,$ids:[ID!]!){requestReviews(input:{pullRequestId:$pr,botIds:$ids,union:true}){clientMutationId}}' \
-f pr="$(gh pr view <n> --json id -q .id)" -f ids=BOT_kgDOCnlnWA
REST also works, with the login spelled copilot-pull-request-reviewer[bot] —
without the [bot] suffix it 422s as "not a collaborator".
In a worktree-isolated agent the shell guard refuses an inline
gh api graphql -f query='mutation(...)' as "too complex to verify". Put the
query in a file and pass -F query=@file; PR comment bodies likewise go
through -F body=@file rather than command substitution.
Two environment notes. gh is not on PATH here — the name is
shell-aliased to git-hub, a different tool — so use
nix shell nixpkgs#gh --command gh …. And a Copilot review takes about six
minutes; tool calls return fast, which makes elapsed time easy to misjudge, so
check date -u against the GitHub timeline before concluding a review is stuck.
(One agent closed and reopened a PR to "unstick" a review that was proceeding
normally.)
Across four PRs Copilot has found genuine bugs and no false positives, so its
findings are worth the loop. But judge each one against the repo's doctrine
rather than applying it reflexively, and when you decline, reply on the thread
with the reason. The distinction that has mattered: a finding can be correct
and still be wrong to fix in that PR. On #12, a non-ASCII truncate panic was
applied (byte-identical on ASCII, so it cost no evidence) while a hint-line
padding bug in the same file was declined — fixing it would have rewritten the
exact-frame characterization tests that were the PR's only evidence the
migration changed nothing. Two right findings, different costs. File the
declined one.
Under merge-as-soon-as-green, a review round can land after its own merge.
GitHub deletes the branch when a PR merges, so a fix push to the old branch name
silently succeeds and accomplishes nothing — it re-creates a branch main
will never see, CI runs on it, and the commit is nowhere. The tell is the push
printing * [new branch] where you expected an old..new range. It happened on
#51: the third review round completed four minutes after the merge, and the
correction it prompted went to a re-created wave/b-projection-gaps. The repair
is to branch from gh/main, cherry-pick, open a follow-up PR, and delete the
stray re-creation. Check gh pr view <n> --json state before pushing a fix to
a PR you have not looked at in a few minutes, rather than after.
Merge only once Copilot passes. Prefer a merge commit — AGENTS.md says
merges over rebases, and a wave's commits are individually meaningful.
Never hand-edit .beads/issues.jsonl
bd manipulates that file and auto-exports to it. Editing it — or even
git checkout-ing it, which fires the post-checkout hook — breaks auto-export
and desynchronises export-state.json. Use bd commands, let auto-export run,
and commit whatever it leaves.
Cite a ticket ID you have read back
bd create assigns the ID; it is not derivable from the title. An orchestrator
that files with output suppressed and then writes the ticket into a gotcha or an
ADR will invent one — six invented IDs survived into context/ in a single
session before an agent tried one and found nothing. Read the ID back after
filing, and before pushing docs run the audit:
grep -rohE 'improvise-[a-z0-9]{3,8}\b' \
context README.md AGENTS.md CLAUDE.md crates src tests examples web harness docs \
| sort -u \
| grep -vE '^improvise-(core|formula|io|protocol|command|gp|ws|worker|wasm|harness|registry|side)$' \
> /tmp/bd-audit-ids.txt
bd show $(cat /tmp/bd-audit-ids.txt) 2>&1 \
| grep -iE 'not found|no such issue' || echo "all resolve"
Three things the earlier version of this recipe got wrong, each of which let a real defect through:
- It scanned two paths (
context/repo-map.md context/adr/*.md), so it found one dead id in the repo map and missed both copies of it inharness/tests/shell.spec.js. Ticket IDs are cited in code comments, inREADME.mdand inweb/, not only incontext/. [a-z0-9]{3,4}cannot see a commit SHA wearing the prefix. A seven-hex commit sha cited asimprovise-<sha>survived incrates/improvise-core/src/workbook.rsprecisely because it was too long to match. An ID-shaped non-ID is worse than a dead ID, because the diagnosis is identical and the repair is not.- The exclusion list named only
coreandwasm, so every other crate name would have been reported missing. The exclusions above also cover the non-ticket tokens this repo really contains: a package name, a temp file name, and the prose word "improvise-side". They are anchored^…$for the same reason the recipe is read as code: unanchored, thegpalternative is a prefix match, so a future real ticket whose id happens to begingpis silently excluded and the audit reports nothing while skipping it. An exclusion list is a filter, and a filter that over-matches fails in the direction that looks like success. (Anchoring it is also what caught the example id this very paragraph originally spelled out — see the note below.)
Note the recipe's own prose deliberately spells no live or dead id: a document that lists ids as examples makes itself a source of audit noise.
One environment note: in a worktree-isolated agent the shell guard refuses a
loop that passes a runtime-computed argument to bd, so the recipe above
materialises the id list into a file and hands bd show the whole list in one
call rather than looping. If bd show in your build does not take several ids,
run the ids through xargs -n1 -I{} bd show {} from a plain shell instead.
A dead ID is worse than no ID: it reads as a promise that the follow-up exists.
Before filing a ticket, search
Agent-filed issues duplicate work that is already open, sometimes already
in progress. Two duplicates were filed in this repo within minutes of the
hand-backs that prompted them. bd search the core concept and scan
in-progress issues first.
Beads Issue Tracker
This project uses bd (beads) for issue tracking. Run bd prime to see full workflow context and commands.
Quick Reference
bd ready # Find available work
bd show <id> # View issue details
bd update <id> --claim # Claim work
bd close <id> # Complete work
Rules
- Use
bdfor ALL task tracking — do NOT use TodoWrite, TaskCreate, or markdown TODO lists (the exception being that you must maintain context/design-principles.md and context/repo-map.md) - Run
bd primefor detailed command reference and session close protocol - Use
bd rememberfor persistent knowledge — do NOT use MEMORY.md files (the exception being that you must maintain context/design-principles.md and context/repo-map.md)
Session Completion
When ending a work session, you MUST complete ALL steps below. Work is NOT complete until git push succeeds.
MANDATORY WORKFLOW:
- File issues for remaining work - Create issues for anything that needs follow-up
- Run quality gates (if code changed) - Tests, linters, builds
- Update issue status - Close finished work, update in-progress items
- PUSH TO REMOTE - This is MANDATORY:
git merge origin/main bd dolt push git push git status # MUST show "up to date with origin" - Clean up - Clear stashes, prune remote branches
- Verify - All changes committed AND pushed
- Hand off - Provide context for next session
CRITICAL RULES:
- Work is NOT complete until
git pushsucceeds - NEVER stop before pushing - that leaves work stranded locally
- NEVER say "ready to push when you are" - YOU must push
- If push fails, resolve and retry until it succeeds
Beads Issue Tracker
Use Beads (bd) for durable task tracking in repositories that include it. Use the beads skill at .agents/skills/beads/SKILL.md (project install) or ~/.agents/skills/beads/SKILL.md (global install) for Beads workflow guidance, then use the bd CLI for issue operations.
Quick Reference
bd ready # Find available work
bd show <id> # View issue details
bd update <id> --claim # Claim work
bd close <id> # Complete work
bd prime # Refresh Beads context
Rules
- Use
bdfor all task tracking; do not create markdown TODO lists. - Run
bd primewhen Beads context is missing or stale. Codex 0.129.0+ can load Beads context automatically through native hooks; use/hooksto inspect or toggle them. - Keep persistent project memory in Beads via
bd remember; do not create ad hoc memory files.
Architecture in one line: issues live in a local Dolt DB; sync uses refs/dolt/data on your git remote; .beads/issues.jsonl is a passive export. See https://github.com/gastownhall/beads/blob/main/docs/core-concepts/sync-concepts.md for details and anti-patterns.