Two user rulings. Documentation should not spend itself on history -- that is bloat. Prose docs now lead with the rule and keep only the line that stops it looking arbitrary; the worked examples and the how-we-found-it move into doctrine/2 text, which is what that predicate is for and where a reader goes deliberately rather than while looking for a command. Trimmed: both skills, context/code/kb-tool.md, and the kb paragraph in AGENTS.md. Anything an agent posts to GitHub goes out under the owner's account, so every comment, review and issue body now opens with a line naming the model and that an agent wrote it. A PR body's generated-with footer already did this; comments carried nothing, and an unattributed one reads as his own words to every reader -- including a reviewer deciding how much weight to give it. The reply on PR #68 has been amended in place. improvise-xfsb files the structural fix: a GitHub App or machine user so agents post under their own identity. An attribution line is a convention an agent can forget; a separate identity cannot be. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01FC2jVn8Au7E9JPkw6bwXXH
4.8 KiB
Maintaining the knowledge base
prolog-sessions/kb.pl is executable knowledge, checked by CI. This is the
argument for how it is written, and why the Prolog MCP stopped being the way.
Why the MCP was retired
loadProgram replaces a whole predicate, so adding one clause means
re-sending every existing clause of it through an agent's context window — and a
short payload silently drops the rest. Three further blockers: saveSession
re-adds the MCP's own host_rpc shims and reserializes the whole file, and
assertz raises permission_error(modify, static_procedure) against a
consulted predicate, so there is no incremental route through it at all.
What replaced it
scripts/kb, a shell entry point over scripts/kb-merge.pl.
Clauses are read as DATA, never consulted. read_term/3 in a loop yields a
list of terms; merging is list manipulation; portray_clause/1 writes them
back. Nothing is ever asserted, so the static-procedure wall is not reached and
the cost of adding a clause is the clause.
Canonical form is read_term in, portray_clause out. This was not
designed, it was measured: all 495 facts in the existing file — including every
escaped quote — round-trip byte-identically, and the form is a fixed point in
one pass. The only change on first use is that rules move from the MCP's
two-line layout to one line, which is why the reformat lands with this tool
rather than before it: the MCP would re-expand them on its next save and the two
would thrash.
trealla comes from the dev shell. Reaching it through nix shell per
invocation cost more than the work: the tool's first real use timed out past two
minutes on a write that takes 0.42 seconds with tpl on PATH.
The guards, and why each exists
Every one of these was added because injecting its fault showed the tool accepting something it should refuse. None was found by reading.
The round-trip check. After writing, the file is read back and required to
be the clauses intended. A serializer bug is the wipe-the-knowledge-base failure
with a new owner, and this is the only check that sees it. Note it compares
variant equality via numbervars over a copy — reading a term back yields
fresh variables, so == compares variable identity and reports every rule as a
difference.
kb_consistent runs on the CANDIDATE. The file is replaced only after the
check passes, so a delta that breaks the knowledge base leaves it untouched
rather than requiring a revert.
Parse errors are caught explicitly. An uncaught syntax error drops trealla
into its REPL, which hangs with a terminal and exits 0 without one — a
refusal that reads as acceptance. scripts/kb also closes stdin on every call
as a backstop.
Every run reaches a halt/1. tpl exits 0 unless a halt is reached:
measured on 3.10.3, -g "fail" and -g "throw(boom)" both exit 0, and so do
fail,halt and throw(boom),halt, because a goal that fails or throws never
reaches the halt beside it. halt(2) alone exits 2, so halt works — the default
is the hazard. The goal used is therefore
(catch(main,E,(write(user_error,E),nl(user_error),halt(2))) -> halt(0) ; halt(1))
which gives 0, 2 and 1 for success, throw and failure. Without it, if ! merge ... reads a crashed merge as a clean one and replaces the knowledge base.
Terms must be callable. 42. parses, is not a clause, and reached the
knowledge base as a fact whose head is a number. kb_consistent has no opinion
about stray terms, so nothing objected.
A clause can be retired. kb rm takes keys and refuses if any of them is
absent, because a typo'd key would otherwise report success and leave the clause
in place. Without it no correction could ever drop a fact — the first thing it
was used for was retiring kb_is_maintained_through_the_mcp, whose name was
the claim that went false.
Duplicate keys are refused by default. A key is the functor plus every
argument but the last, so doctrine(Name,_) keys on the name and
decision(Id,Key,_) on the pair. replace is the door a correction goes
through, and it overwrites in place — a count that grew would be two clauses
under one name.
What no test here reaches
The key rule is looser than functional/1 for crate/3, which keys on the
first argument alone; kb_consistent is the backstop for that case rather than
the merge.
A clause name cited inside another clause's string is unchecked — dropping or
renaming a clause silently dangles every clause referring to it
(improvise-2f97).
A shebang would let kb-merge.pl run directly and collapse the two files into
one. It does not work on trealla 3.10.3: #! is a syntax error that aborts the
consult, so main/0 is never defined, and tpl wants -- args after the
file, which a shebang cannot inject. Worth re-testing if trealla gains script
support.