- see @AGENTS.md Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes. Merge with project-specific instructions as needed. **Tradeoff:** These guidelines bias toward caution over speed. For trivial tasks, use judgment. ## 1. Think Before Coding **Don't assume. Don't hide confusion. Surface tradeoffs.** Before implementing: - State your assumptions explicitly. If uncertain, ask. - If multiple interpretations exist, present them - don't pick silently. - If a simpler approach exists, say so. Push back when warranted. - If something is unclear, stop. Name what's confusing. Ask. ## 2. Simplicity First **Minimum code that solves the problem. Nothing speculative.** - No features beyond what was asked. - No abstractions for single-use code. - No "flexibility" or "configurability" that wasn't requested. - No error handling for impossible scenarios. - If you write 200 lines and it could be 50, rewrite it. Ask yourself: "Would a senior engineer say this is overcomplicated?" If yes, simplify. ## 3. Surgical Changes **Touch only what you must. Clean up only your own mess.** When editing existing code: - Don't "improve" adjacent code, comments, or formatting. - Don't refactor things that aren't broken. - Match existing style, even if you'd do it differently. - If you notice unrelated dead code, mention it - don't delete it. When your changes create orphans: - Remove imports/variables/functions that YOUR changes made unused. - Don't remove pre-existing dead code unless asked. The test: Every changed line should trace directly to the user's request. ## 4. Goal-Driven Execution **Define success criteria. Loop until verified.** Transform tasks into verifiable goals: - "Add validation" → "Write tests for invalid inputs, then make them pass" - "Fix the bug" → "Write a test that reproduces it, then make it pass" - "Refactor X" → "Ensure tests pass before and after" For multi-step tasks, state a brief plan: ``` 1. [Step] → verify: [check] 2. [Step] → verify: [check] 3. [Step] → verify: [check] ``` Strong success criteria let you loop independently. Weak criteria ("make it work") require constant clarification. --- **These guidelines are working if:** fewer unnecessary changes in diffs, fewer rewrites due to overcomplication, and clarifying questions come before implementation rather than after mistakes. ## Beads Issue Tracker This project uses **bd (beads)** for issue tracking. Run `bd prime` to see full workflow context and commands. ### Quick Reference ```bash bd ready # Find available work bd show # View issue details bd update --claim # Claim work bd close # Complete work ``` ### Rules - Use `bd` for ALL task tracking — do NOT use TodoWrite, TaskCreate, or markdown TODO lists (the exception being that you must maintain context/design-principles.md and context/repo-map.md) - Run `bd prime` for detailed command reference and session close protocol - Use `bd remember` for persistent knowledge — do NOT use MEMORY.md files (the exception being that you must maintain context/design-principles.md and context/repo-map.md) ## Session Completion **When ending a work session**, you MUST complete ALL steps below. Work is NOT complete until `git push` succeeds. **MANDATORY WORKFLOW:** 1. **File issues for remaining work** - Create issues for anything that needs follow-up 2. **Run quality gates** (if code changed) - Tests, linters, builds 3. **Update issue status** - Close finished work, update in-progress items 4. **PUSH TO REMOTE** - This is MANDATORY: ```bash git merge origin/main bd dolt push git push git status # MUST show "up to date with origin" ``` 5. **Clean up** - Clear stashes, prune remote branches 6. **Verify** - All changes committed AND pushed 7. **Hand off** - Provide context for next session **CRITICAL RULES:** - Work is NOT complete until `git push` succeeds - NEVER stop before pushing - that leaves work stranded locally - NEVER say "ready to push when you are" - YOU must push - If push fails, resolve and retry until it succeeds