The browser JavaScript is argued, not tested, and the two rules it can break
are both about WHEN: an async message listener does not serialize, and a
watchdog must be disarmed rather than pre-empted. Both found by review
rather than by a test, because nothing here runs a browser.
Plus the third thing no test can see: three comments in one range said 'not
built yet' about work that landed in that same range, each because a
follow-up commit updated one copy of an argument and not its siblings.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EoW5BB87ZZdm96SvBTWawH
Work reaches GitHub as a branch and a PR. The orchestrator still merges
agent branches into its local main to integrate and run the gates -- that is
how conflicts get found early -- but the push is a branch push.
Written because it drifted: 27 commits across six agent branches, including
a new crate, a new protocol type and a type moving between crates, went
straight to main unreviewed while this file already said not to. Records the
review-only PR as the cheap repair, and that rewinding the default branch to
fake a mergeable PR is not worth it with other collaborators on the repo.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EoW5BB87ZZdm96SvBTWawH
Six improvise-* IDs cited in repo-map and ADR 001 never existed -- filed
with output suppressed and then written into the docs from memory. A dead ID
is worse than no ID, because it reads as a promise the follow-up exists. All
six corrected to the real tickets, and AGENTS.md gains the audit loop.
AGENTS.md also gains what PR #12 learned: requestReviews takes botIds and not
userIds, gh is shell-aliased to a different tool here, a Copilot review takes
about six minutes, and a finding can be CORRECT and still be wrong to fix in
that PR -- #12 applied a truncate panic (byte-identical on ASCII, so it cost
no evidence) and declined a padding bug in the same file that would have
rewritten the characterization tests which were the PR's only evidence.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EoW5BB87ZZdm96SvBTWawH
Most work here is done by waves of agents in worktrees, and every rule in
this section was learned by breaking it: the three orchestrator-only files
and why, that kb.pl additions must be batched because loadProgram replaces a
whole predicate, that tickets sharing a file belong to one agent, that a
worktree does not reliably branch from the orchestrator's HEAD, that direnv
status reports 0 for allowed, and that the code review's characteristic find
here is a test that passes while the thing it names is broken.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EoW5BB87ZZdm96SvBTWawH
Edward Langley